NEW YORK (AP) 鈥 Donald Trump won't make his own closing argument in his New York civil business fraud trial after his lawyers objected to the judge's insistence that the former president would stick to 鈥渞elevant鈥 matters.
rescinded permission on Wednesday, a day ahead of closing arguments in the trial.
The trial could cost Trump and strip him of his ability to do business in New York. His lawyers had signaled last week that he planned to take the extraordinary step of , in addition to arguments from his legal team.
Trump is a defendant in the case, brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James. She claims his net worth was inflated by billions of dollars on financial statements that helped him secure business loans and insurance.
The former president and current Republican 2024 front-runner denies any wrongdoing, and he has lambasted the case as a 鈥渉oax鈥 and a political attack on him. James and the judge are Democrats.
It鈥檚 extremely unusual for people who have lawyers to give their own closing arguments. In that happened over recent days and was filed in court Wednesday, Engoron initially approved the unusual request, saying he was 鈥渋ncluding to let everyone have his or her say.鈥
But he said Trump would have to limit his remarks to the boundaries that cover attorneys鈥 closing arguments: 鈥渃ommentary on the relevant, material facts that are in evidence, and application of the relevant law to those facts.鈥
He would not be allowed to introduce new evidence, 鈥渃omment on irrelevant matters鈥 or 鈥渄eliver a campaign speech鈥 鈥 or impugn the judge, his staff, the attorney general, her lawyers or the court system, the judge wrote.
Trump attorney Christopher Kise responded that those limitations were 鈥渇raught with ambiguities, creating the substantial likelihood for misinterpretation or an unintended violation. Engoron said that they were 鈥漴easonable, normal limits,鈥 but Kise termed them 鈥渧ery unfair.鈥
鈥淵ou are not allowing President Trump, who has been wrongfully demeaned and belittled by an out of control, politically motivated attorney general, to speak about the things that must be spoken about,鈥 the attorney wrote.
After not hearing from Trump鈥檚 lawyers by a noon Wednesday deadline, Engoron wrote that he assumed Trump was not agreeing to the ground rules and therefore would not be speaking.
Taking on a role usually performed by an attorney is risky for any defendant. But Trump鈥檚 desire to speak in court was potentially even more precarious, as he has already run afoul of the judge over prior comments about the case.
Engoron imposed a limited , barring all participants in the trial from commenting about court staffers, after Trump made a disparaging social media post about the judge鈥檚 law clerk on the second day of the trial in October. The post included a false insinuation about the clerk's personal life.
The judge later fined Trump a total of $15,000, saying he'd repeatedly violated the order. Trump's defense team is appealing it.
During the recent email exchange about Trump's potential summation, Engoron warned Trump's lawyers that if the former president violated the gag order, he鈥檇 be removed from the courtroom and fined at least $50,000.
in the case in November, sparring verbally with the judge and state lawyers as he defended himself and his real estate empire. He considered but skipped a second round of testimony, during the portion of the trial when his own lawyers were calling witnesses. After teasing his return appearance, he changed course and said he had 鈥渘othing more to say.鈥
