CHICAGO (AP) 鈥 Four years of Donald Trump's false claims about a stolen 2020 election have kindled growing suspicion of voting machines among conspiracy theorists. One of their solutions is to replace the tabulators that count every vote with people who will do that by hand.
Controversies over the issue have flared periodically in pockets of the country before the 2024 presidential election even though research has shown that is more prone to error, costlier and likely to delay results.
The few counties that have attempted the massive task have found the process more time-consuming, expensive and inaccurate than expected.
In Texas鈥 Gillespie County, a hand-count of Republican primary election ballots this year stretched into the early morning hours, taking almost 24 consecutive hours with 200 people counting ballots, . The hand-count about double the wage costs of the 2020 Republican primary and involved fixing a , the news nonprofits reported.
In rural Nye County in Nevada, where volunteers in 2022 embarked on an of midterm votes, mismatched tallies led to recount after recount. After the first day of counting, the county clerk, Mark Kampf, of nearly 25% between the hand and machine count, attributing it to human counting error. The painstakingly slow process was halted by the state鈥檚 Supreme Court over concerns that early vote tallies could be leaked publicly.
Shasta County, a conservative rural county in northern California, last year abandoned plans to hand-count ballots after the plan was $1.6 million and require more than 1,200 additional employees.
Still, continue to call for hand-counting.
Most recently, Georgia鈥檚 State Election Board poll workers to count the number of paper ballots, but not the votes, by hand after voting is completed. The counting would have to be done by three separate poll workers until all three counts are the same.
The new rule went against the advice of the state attorney general, the secretary of state and an association of county election officials.
A 鈥榞rassroots鈥 movement
Efforts to replace modern voting machines with more laborious, error-prone hand-counting are rooted in a set of about that have been spread by Trump . Some Republicans, inspired by claiming that widespread fraud cost Trump reelection in , have pushed for hand-counting ballots and banning the electronic tabulators used to scan ballots and record votes, despite or major irregularities.
鈥淭his movement could have died if it had just been a flash in the pan from the 2020 election,鈥 said Charles Stewart, a political science professor at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. But conspiracy theorists such as and MyPillow founder have traveled the country working 鈥渢o create a grassroots social movement around this skepticism,鈥 Stewart said.
While these conspiracy theories are not common nationwide, they have found a stubborn hold in pockets of the country, 鈥減rimarily in the deepest red parts of the deepest red states,鈥 Stewart said.
Problems with cost, speed and accuracy
The hand-counting of ballots threatens to delay results by days, weeks or even months, depending on jurisdiction and staffing. Swapping machines with hand-counts would not only be slower but also increase the chances for mistakes and fraud, research has shown.
In a New Hampshire study, poll workers who counted ballots by hand were off by 8%, compared with a 0.5% error rate for machine counting.
鈥淗uman beings are really bad at tedious things, and counting ballots is among the most tedious things we could do,鈥 Stewart said. 鈥淐omputers are very good at tedious things. They can count very quickly and very accurately.鈥
Paper ballots already used
Trump and other Republicans have called for the use of paper ballots in this year's election. In fact, paper ballots or paper records of every vote already are produced in nearly every state.
The Brennan Center at New York University estimates that of all votes nationwide will be cast on paper in this year's presidential election.
Paper ballots also are used in postelection, hand-count audits to identify any irregularities with ballot scanning and counting and to ensure the machine results are accurate. Election officials also conduct accuracy testing on the machines before every election.
Susannah Goodman, director of election security at Common Cause, said informing voters of the checks already in place can help reduce the fear and distrust at the center of calls for hand-counting ballots.
鈥淚f you show voters the process and all of the steps that are taken to ensure the outcome is correct 鈥 not just tell, show 鈥 they gain confidence,鈥 she said.
___
Read more about how U.S. elections work at , a series from The Associated Press aimed at helping make sense of the American democracy. The AP receives support from several private foundations to enhance its explanatory coverage of elections and democracy. See more about AP鈥檚 democracy initiative . The AP is solely responsible for all content.
